Freedom Run

This weekend I went for a run. Afterward I jumped in a river with my clothes on. And floating around the river at dusk, my sweat becoming part of the water, I wished I could remove all my clothes and lay on the wharf at my leisure, or swim a little farther out, or walk naked into a house for a bottle of wine and perhaps some chips or fruit.

It just reinforced my philosophy that I don’t need and have never wanted designer handbags or clothes, fancy cars, or costly jewels. But I would like some land. And I would like some freedom. It’s what I work so hard for.

One Day...

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Mascot Mondays #6 of 12: Friends in the Mascot Part Two

On March 14, 1891, in response to the murder of police chief David Hennessy the preceding year, citizens of New Orleans stormed the local prisons and lynched eleven Italians they believed were responsible for the murders. When Hennessy was gunned down, he allegedly whispered, “Dagos did it.” Multiple arrests occurred within the Italian community and when the trials were over, all of the suspects either had mistrials or were found not guilty. The lynchings that followed were considered the largest lynching in U.S. history.

One night last year, I was at Southport Hall talking to my friend and one of the owners, Mark Bagnetto. I mentioned some of my research and he exclaimed that one of his relatives was lynched during the attack! Sure enough, I checked the records and one of the victims was an Antonio Bagnetto. He was the last of the eleven to die and his death, in fact, was one of the few that was documented in fairly graphic terms.

News of the lynchings made headlines across the country, with many of the newspapers standing in favor of the murders. The New York Times ran an article stating, “Chief Hennessy Avenged; eleven of his Italian assassins lynched by a mob.” The Mascot was against the lynchings but here is what they wrote about Antonio Bagnetto:

Execution of Bagnetto. While the crowd was still viewing the ghastly picture presented by Politez as he dangled from the lamppost at the corner of Treme and St. Ann streets there was a sudden commotion at the Orleans street or main entrance of the prison, and just as the loud hum of voices broke into a hoarse roar that went sweeping around the prison and rolled down to Congo Swuare, a narrow lane was opened in the crowd and half a dozen men dashed out beneath the low, broad archway which overhangs the main entrance, dragging something along the floor by a stout tope. At the end of the rope was the writhing form of Antonio Bagnetto, and the rope was fastened by a running noose around his neck. Swiftly those holding the rope dashed over the banquette across the roadway and to the foot of a dead tree on the up-town side of the neutral ground, their victim lying on his back and struggling as he went.

Bagnetto’s journey to the gallows tree was a short and swift, but terrible one. As he was hauled through that narrow lane in the crowd those nearest him jabbed him with their canes, beat him with sticks and kicked him as he was dragged past them, so that by the time he had reached the foot of the tree appeared to be more dead than alive.

An active man climbed the tree and threw the end of the rope over a limb, but before the weight of the prisoner was more than half off the ground the rotten limb broke and Bagnetto fell to the ground once more, apparently in a semi-conscious condition. Again the end of the rope was thrown to the man who was still in the tree. This time he passed the rope over a stout, sound limb, which proved sufficiently strong to sustain the weight of the victim who was quickly hanging far above the heads of the crowd. Bagnetto’s final struggles were soon over, as he appeared to have been mortally hurt before he was finally suspended. As the man who adjusted the rope was descending from the tree, he gave the dying man a kick with the heel of his boot on the forehead, but beyond a convulsive shudder Bagnetto gave no sign that he felt this last inflict upon him.

Thus ended the most terrible outbreak of Lynch Law ever witnessed in New Orleans.

Posted in History, Mascot Mondays, New Orleans, Politics, The Mascot | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Et tu, Al Rose?

It is well known that Al Rose’s book “Storyville, New Orleans,” published in 1974, is the premier book on Storyville. It’s the book that started it all. It contains some amazing interviews, and a plethora of photographs and advertisements from that era.

And I know this will probably bite me in the ass when I make my first mistake but… this one is kind of a biggie. At least to me.

Rose stated that the Mascot was founded by Joseph Livesy and Billy Mack. Not true.

First off, Joseph’s name is spelled Livesey.

Second, it was founded by Livesey as well as George Osmond and J.S. Bossier. W.M. “Billy” Mack did not join the paper until 1886 – four years after the paper’s debut. In fact, January 16, 1886 was the first time Mack was listed as a proprietor in the newspaper and it was also the same year that he was listed in the City Directory as one of the owners.

Rose also stated that Livesey died in the winter of 1884. Wrong; he died in March of 1884. When Livesey died, Adolphe Zenneck bought an interest in the paper.

It also states that “the shock-proof citizens of the Crescent City were in no way astonished by the paper’s exposes but relished its gossipy quality and its occasional behind-the-scenes peeks at municipal graft and vice.”

Wrong again – I would say that multiple libel suits, three murders, jail time, as well as the Mascot making headlines in newspapers across the county was, in fact, astonishing! Rose doesn’t mention any of this.

However, Rose did have this to say about the Mascot, which I do agree with: “As time went on its political exposures did begin to have an astringent effect on the public, and there is no doubt that certain beneficial social changes were attributable, at least in part, to the influence of the paper.”

Rose uses illustrations, articles, and quotes from the Mascot MANY times. The least he could do was check some basic facts.

Come on, Al… Really!

Posted in History, New Orleans, Research, The Mascot | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Eugene F. Bunch

Love all the comments about Bunch and Hobgood. Here are a few snippets I found out about Eugene Bunch’s personal life.

“Eugene F. Bunch, who robbed the express car on the Northeastern railroad, on Saturday morning, November 3. Of about $28,000, was at one time a resident of Biloxi.

In 1858 or 1859 Bunch’s father and family came to Biloxi and rented Mrs. Shearer’s house on Water street. The family consisted of wife, sons and daughters, and were very respectable people.

Eugene Bunch was a young man, 16 or 17 years of age. They lived in Biloxi a year or two and were then lost sight of to our informant.

During their residence in Biloxi they associated on terms of intimacy with the most respectable people in the two and were respected and esteemed, and so far as the rest of family are concerned, no whisper of bad conduct on their part has ever been heard. All lived respectably and died in good repute.

Eugene Bunch, the robber, came to Biloxi on Sunday last summer and spent the day in social intercourse with friends and old acquaintances. He seems of late years to have been a black sheep in a family of respectability.”

The Biloxi Herald. November 11, 1888.

A little something about his “wife.” 

“…Cora Ellis, passing as Mrs. Girard, of Tyler, Tex., who had arrived here on her way from Covington, LA (the place where Pounds was arrested), to Texas, was arrested, and $300 of the stolen money was found sewed in her clothing. She has been living with E.F. Bunch, who committed the train robbery. The woman confessed that Bunch gave her the money.

The detectives expect to capture Bunch within two days. He secured $10,300 cash from the express car. He is 45 years old, was born in Noxubee county, Miss., is six feet two inches tall, has red hair and whiskers, was once school teacher at Amite, La., and later clerk of Cook country, Tex.; resided at Gainesville, but was indicted for forgery, and left there two years ago; was with the Burrows boy in the Texas Narrow Gauge train robbery near Texarkana; was arrested, turned state’s evidence, was bailed out by the Southern Express company, disappeared and was not heard of again until the robbery ten days ago.

Among the articles found in ‘Mrs. Girard’s’ trunk was a package containing eight dynamite cartridges. She also had two heavy revolvers, which, she stated, she always carried, and slept with them under her pillow.”

Trenton Evening Times. November 13, 1888.

 

“… He was well known about Oskya, Miss., about sixteen miles east of which town he once resided. He had an inordinate passion for gambling, which caused him to be disliked in some neighborhoods, and it is said taught some of his scholars to play poker instead of the rudiments of learning.

…The officers who know him say that Bunch is a desperate character, and some make the prediction that he will never be captured alive unless he is caught unarmed, which is hardly probably, since a brace of six-shooters and a bowie knife are his constant companions.”

The Daily Picayune. November 15, 1888.

 

“… Eugene F. Bunch was born in Mississippi in 1841. The family removed to Louisiana in his childhood and settled in Tangipahoa Parish. He was an apt student and received a good education. When the war broke out he enlisted in a company raised in the parish and made a gallant record in the service. The wildness of his disposition first manifested itself in the campaign in Eastern Louisiana.

At the close of the war Bunch returned to Tangipahoa and opened a school at Amite. Dissipation soon led to his retirement and he went to Texas, locating at Gainesville. He reformed, was elected City Clerk, and did a thriving business as a land speculator. The tide turned, and he defaulted to a large amount. He then became a train robber, and twice in quick succession held up trains near Texarkana in 1886-7.

While enjoying the proceeds of these robberies he became acquainted with a woman, attractive, educated, and of good family, who had left her husband and was living in Dallas. She became infatuated with him and accompanied him on his return to Louisiana.

On Nov. 3, 1888, Bunch robbed the New Orleans and Northeastern train at Derby, Miss., securing nearly $30,000. He fled to the wilds of Honey Island, and from thence has made more than one raid on trains, principally on the Illinois Central Railroad. Of these raids the most recent and most profitable were the robberies at Duck Hill and Newsom’s Mill.

Detectives were put on this track immediately after the Derby robbery, but their search met with only indifferent success.”

The New York Times. August 23, 1892.

 

“The youngest of a family of two sons and a daughter… Bunch proved to be a good solider and gave many evidence of that bravery approaching almost to desperation which marked his career in life. While not exactly of a quarrelsome disposition, he was quick tempered and became involved in many quarrels and fights with his comrades, but nothing serious came from these differences. He contracted some bad habits, however, during the campaign around Port Hudson, Baton Rouge and Eastern Louisiana which was a passion for gambling and drinking.

… taught school at Amite city. His habits mitigated against his success as a pedagogue and soon his dissipation became known and, as usual in a small country, became common talk. He was deposed and for a time matters went from bad to worse. He became a confirmed drunkard, and was soon an object of pity or contempt.

Finding that all chances of obtaining a livelihood in that community were at an end, Bunch emigrated to Texas and started anew a career which ended in his death. Gainesville, in Cooke county, Tex., was the place at which he determined to remain and he quickly became quite a popular man, having in a great extent reformed, especially the drinking habit. His father, mother, sister and brother had meantime died, victims to consumption, of which insidious diseases Bunch believed he would himself eventually fall a victim.

He was elected city clerk in Gainesville, and having access to all the books and papers, as well as handling considerable cash, Bunch lived in clover. Land was at that time being eagerly sought for in that locality, and Bunch availed himself of this fact to reap a harvest of money. His financial ventures and the discrepancies in his cash soon became known, but not before Bunch had shaken the dust of Gainesville from his feet. His ill-gotten wealth, however, seemed to take unto itself wings, and was soon gone. Bunch thus adopted the life of a train robber.

… Bunch was a tall, not bad looking man. In fact a typical Texas brave, and strange as it may appear, the woman became infatuated with him. In the latter part of May or early in June 1888, Bunch assumed the name of captain, and with his ostensible wife he appeared in New Orleans. They took up their quarters at a Carondelet street boarding-house, and although living quietly, yet attracted attention from the contrast in their appearance.

During the following month the pair frequently absented themselves from the city, sometimes for several days at a time; their little tours or excursions being to Bay St. Louis, Pearlington, Pearl River, Covington and various places in St. Tammany, Washington or Tangipahoa parishes, to all which Bunch was well acquainted, and knew every foot of ground, every bypath, stream or road, for he was an excellent woodsman and hunter, being a splendid shot with the rifle, and thanks to his Texas education, exceedingly quick with his revolver and a good marksman. These accomplishments in a manner explained his great fondness for weapons, a good stock of which he always had in his room…”

The Daily Picayune. August 23, 1892.

 

“…When Rube Burrows was killed in Alabama there was a disposition to make a sort of outlaw hero of him. He was not, however, to be compared with Bunch in any respect, whose life if fully told, would give enough material for half a dozen sensationally stories.

Detective Jackson, who led the chase against both me, and who knew both thoroughly, says that to compare Bunch with Burrows was a compare a comet to the lighted end of a cigar.

‘Burrows,’ he said, ‘was made a hero of by the enthusiasts. He would peach on his pals when in a tight place; he would sacrifice his liberty of his partner in crime to his own personal safety. Bunch would have died before doing that. He was a far braver man, far more dangerous and far more reckless; but his heart was as big as a bucket. He was jovial, jolly and gay – a typical bandit, who thought his profession of road agent a brave and proper one. He had two faults, and might have excaped but for them – he was too companionable and talked too much, and he believed too much in human nature. He had an unfortunate confidence in his friends.’

This opinion is shared by every one who knew Bunch, and no man was better known in the Southwest under his own name or as Gerard or Grail, as he frequently called himself. He went everywhere and met everybody; was a great traveler, and had been to every portion of the country, and there are probably thousands of people who have met a jolly, companionable, good-looking man full of fun and generous to a fault, and been very much taken with him, never knowing that it was Capt. Eugene Bunch, the great train robber.

The Kalamazoo Gazette. October 19, 1892

 

 

 

 

Posted in History, New Orleans, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Mascot Mondays #5 of 12: Friends in the Mascot Part One

One of the great things about my research involving the Mascot is that I have discovered friends’ relatives immortalized in their pages. Two I have confirmed and two I am waiting to confirm (they need to check their family tree).

Here is a little something about the first of my confirmed:  My friend Kathryn Hobgood Ray (a.k.a. Trixie) and her relative the infamous Colonel Edward S. Hobgood, partner to the famous bank robber Eugene Bunch.

The Mascot; August 27, 1892

Eugene Bunch was born in Mississippi in 1841 and was well educated. The youngest of three, he was bright, advanced quickly in his studies, and served in the Civil War. A cultured man, he was once a teacher and newspaper editor. He also became a terrible drunkard, some believe as a result of the war. He moved to Texas, curtailed his drinking and there “lived in clover” as a city clerk in Gainesville. Discrepancies in his books became known, and he shook off the dust of the town and took to robbing trains. Bunch robbed trains in Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. Considered congenial, he had a gentlemanly way about reliving passengers of their money. Bunch would even tip his hat as he took ladies’ purses. Bunch’s career change paid off, and in one raid he and his gang made off with almost $30,000 in cash. In 1892, his gang took $20,000 from a train heist in New Orleans. The Southern Express Company hired the Pinkerton Detectives to hunt down Bunch and his gang, which included Colonel Hobgood.

A posse was formed, and Bunch took to Honey Island Swamp, an area that he was familiar with and that had aided him in the past. An excellent woodsman and hunter, it was said that Bunch knew every foot of ground in Tangipahoa Parish. He and his principal accomplice, Hobgood, were waiting in the “impenetrable” swamp for friends to bring them clothes and supplies. A couple members of his gang had been arrested a few days earlier; regardless, the men felt confident in their hiding place that was like a second home to Bunch. Pinkerton Detective Thomas Jackson, however, was a native of the parish and was just as friendly with the “jungles” of the swamps.

Perhaps it was that both of Bunch’s parents and his two siblings died of consumption and Bunch feared that the dreaded disease would also be his fate that lead to his audacious behavior, or maybe with the death of his entire immediate family, gone were any kind of moral parameters that often accompanied the power of familial guilt. Whatever Bunch’s reason, he swore that he would never be taken alive. Jackson knew this and the detective warned his posse that they were going after a most “desperate” man.

There are conflicting reports on the exact nature of the death of Bunch and capture of Hobgood on August 22, 1892. One states that always on the lookout, Bunch noticed a detective squatting in the bushes to relieve himself and shot at him, missing and drawing attention to himself whereupon he was brought to his end with a Winchester rifle. Another account states that the “noiseless” detectives snuck up on the chatty men, but Bunch noticed them and started to fire but was shot in the process. Another account (this one probably not true) was that once they realized that detectives were near, Hobgood shot him in the back of the head “Jessie James” style to try and get the $3,000 reward and claim his innocence of the various train robberies once his partner was buried in the ground. What is certain is that Bunch’s life ended that day in the swamp he so loved and that Hobgood was brought to the New Orleans parish prison where curious spectators and former victims came from three states to cast their eyes on the mysterious Colonel Hobgood. This is what the Mascot had to say about him:

He is an ungainly, regular hoosier, wearing high-water pants and with a casual drawl in his speech. When he made his appearance in the yard of the prison, the other prisoners amongst them whom are some tough characters, gathered about him, curious to see such a notorious character. Hobgod did not come up to their expectations, being very far removed in appearance from the dime novel hero who robs trains, marries an heiress and becomes a millionaire. He looked poor, both in finances and adipose. His pants shrunk away from his boots like a prudish old maid from a man. Being slightly knock-kneed does not improve his physical appearance, nor does his shambling gait.

If loud laughter be a sign of a successful debut, that of Hobgood was a great success. The hero of Tangipahoa parish, the terror of the Florida parishes, stood blinking before the town toughs like a new boy at school. “Say, cully, where dit yer git them pants?” roared one. “Coax ‘em down,” advised another. “Call that a train robber,” scornfully said one juvenile prisoner with an ineffable look of contempt upon his face, “dat ting looks more like a sneak thief.” It was a rude shattering of the idol of his dreams, the train robber who wore a silver-fringed buck-skin suit, bestrode a magnificent mustang and was so handsome that even polecats fell in love with him. “You’re a fraud,” added the boy, and walked off with his hands in his pockets.

Hobgood had the last laugh in this instance. He was found guilty of grand larceny, but due to a mistake in his indictment, he was released. Any mirth he may have had, however, was short-lived, as this victory did not mean that he had won his freedom. Hobgood was next transferred from one jail to another to stand trial for two other murders.

During the early morning of July 31, 1893, Hobgood and another prisoner, a “white capper,” Will Purvis, were transported in an open carriage some forty-miles to Lauderdale county jail.* Hobgood and Purvis were not in cahoots, just two infamous prisoners being transferred at the same time. The two were under heavy guard as various threats had been received that the prisoners’ friends would release them no matter what the hazards, as well as threats from their enemies that they would lynch the two men no matter what the hazards. There was nothing of violent consequence on their journey, and it would have gone without incident if not for the spiritually symbolic event that occurred as they got close to town.

Hobgood was to stand trial for the murder of an African-American man, I believe his name to be Alex Harrell. Five years earlier Hobgood and Harrell had been riding together along a public road when Hobgood demanded to swap horses with him. Harrell refused and Hobgood allegedly shot him and took his horse. The man rode back to town on the other horse, told his story to a storekeeper and died. Hobgood fled. When Hobgood and Purvis and their guards got close to town, a group of a hundred African-American men and women all on horseback quietly joined the procession, and solemnly and without words, escorted the men to prison.

Hobgood was indicted for his second murder, along with four other men, for the murder of J.M. Terrell in December 1891. Hobgood at the time was running with the Scab boys, Bob Sanford, and the Temple brothers. Terrell’s son had accused the Temple brothers and Hobgood of being too intimate with his wife. The younger Terrell did not want a duel with guns, but he agreed to meet the men to settle the matter in a bare-knuckle fist fight. It was said that the agreement was that after the fight, they would “make friends” and end the feud. At the time of the fight, Terrell was not there and was sent for. He came back with his father, J.M., who was armed with a shotgun to ensure fair play. Temple thrashed young Terrell and when it was over, it appeared that the deal would abide but Hobgood demanded that he get to fight the defeated Terrell as well. Terrell refused, a scuffle broke out and Sanford shot Terrell’s father with a double-barreled shotgun. As the elder Terrell was running away, Hobgood shot him in the back. The man died minutes later. The Scab boys and Temple were arrested, Sanford (sometimes they spelled his name as Sanborn) escaped and was never captured, and Hobgood also fled and was never captured until the death of his former partner Bunch.

Hobgood was first tried for Terrell’s murder; it resulted in a mistrial. He was acquitted on the second trial. He was then arraigned for the murder of Harrell, but his lawyer had the indictment “quashed.” Hobgood waited for requisition papers from the governor of Louisiana for some other charges, but the papers never came. He was then indicted for shooting at the younger Terrell when his father was killed. He was placed under bond of $2000, which was paid by his brother William Hobgood, a known “gentleman of splendid character and good fortune.” William said this about his felonious brother in the Daily Picayune:

Colonel Hobgood says that whisky was at the bottom of all of his troubles, and that never again will a drop of the vile stuff pass his lips, and that he intends to lead an upright and honorable life and make a good citizen.

A few days later, Hobgood announced he was going to write a history of Eugene Bunch. It appears he never did. Little his known about him after that.  It appears, for now at least, that he just disappeared. It’s believed that he died in the 1920s but that is not confirmed. After his various trials, it was hard to track down more information on Hobgood without a more exhaustive search. Maybe one day.

Luckily for us, it is clear that the family lawlessness did not get passed all the way down to Trixie – because she is a paragon of goodness.

 

*The White Caps were a secret racist organization that violently promoted “law and order.” It is said that original members of the Ku Klux Klan came from the White Cap clan. The Will Purvis trial is also pretty famous.

FYI, The majority of this information came from various historical newspapers from Louisiana and Texas.

Posted in History, Mascot Mondays, New Orleans, Research, The Mascot | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

WWOZ & Running of the Bulls

WWOZ has an interview about the NOLA BULLS and used some of my photographs to accompany their feature.

Some of the lovely and dangerous bulls!

You can view the photos and listen to the interview HERE.

You can also view my flickr pages from the 2011 Bull Run, 2010 Bull Run and 2009 Bull Run.

I can not wait until Louis is older and he can say - I have been going to the Bull Run for my WHOLE life!

For other years, you can view my friend Scott Stuntz’s page for some great photos: 2009 Bull Run, 2008 Bull Run, and my blog for the Big Easy Rollergirls from the first ever Bull Run  in 2007!

Once again I am excited about skating AND shooting in the Encierro (bull run) in New Orleans. As always, being on skates in a costume with camera in hand is always challenging. Skating in Muses while photographing it and handing out beads is also formidable, but the Encierro has it’s own unique tests of balance and bravado.

In Muses it’s dark, sometimes cold, people are running up to grab up (or kiss you), and while you are trying to not bump into other rollergirls you are also keeping your eye out so you don’t skate over horse shit or broken beads/glass/trash. In a few sections of the route it’s completely dark. The route is long and typically you are in skates for 4 to 5 hours. But wow, is it FUN!

In the bull run it’s HOT and EARLY and the route is relatively short but you have THOUSANDS of people running around you, including rollergirls in bats zipping past on the warpath. People are looking over their shoulder as they run so if you are trying to turn and get photo of them (already difficult on skates and the pavement) chances are they will not see you and you run the risk of them plowing you over.

Every year I think – maybe this year I will just skate and beat on people – but being able to skate in the event and take pictures gives me an unique perspective as a photographer. No other photographer can maneuver in and out of the crowds as quickly as I can (and granted, I tend to go a bit slower than your average rollergirl when I am skating with expensive equipment but faster than your average runner). I can cover various angles, positions, and sections of the route that other photographers can not. But, the caveat is this – I don’t bring out my best equipment. I usually have to make a decision on my settings and stick with it. I can’t be messing with my f-stops and shutter speed when I am in the midst of hundreds of sprinting, screaming (and probably drunk) people. Complete chaos doesn’t wait for you to make adjustments. And complete chaos frequently changes its scenery (aka light). While I can get distinct angles and cover it more broadly than others, there is something to be said about finding a safe spot, setting up, and shooting from it – and then in that position be able to really get creative.

With that said, I look forward to shooting and skating again this year. Unfortunately, I still have not learned my lesson from having my costume be a hinderance.

Bull Run 2009: I was so dazed and dehydrated at this point. With two of my favorites Elvi Jason and Elvi Scott.

One year, I made a giant flowered cone bra and bull-themed corset. Not exactly the wisest decision considering I had not been on skates in four months because my arm was in a cast. I literally got out of the cast two days before the event. So I was nervous about my wrist and being on skates and wearing this outfit that required even more delicate navigating than usual. Looked great but…

Bull Run 2010: Ironically, this was my most maneuverable costume and the one year I got hurt. I was also proud to be the first ever recipient of the Best Dressed Bull. Cougar won Horniest Bull for her amazing horns.

And last year I made a bra out of bubble guns, and a “galaxy” inspired hooped skirt. Once again – looked great but perhaps not the most sage decision considering what I would be doing it.  I will admit one of my favorite moments was shooting bubbles out of my breasts and completely startling the cop standing next to me.

Bull Run 2011: Blowing bubbles in the back alley with Spanky and CHEAP

I have started the design process for my costume this year and all I can say is “no, I have not learned my lesson.” But to quote the NOLA Bulls – Por que no?

Posted in New Orleans, Photography, Roller Derby | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mascot Mondays 4 of 12: The “Mascot” in Mobile

This small article may seem slightly insignificant, but it shows that the “Mascot” was also distributed in Mobile, AL. This is HUGE news and means HUGE work for me. How did it get there? Where else was it distributed? And it also once again illuminates the question that nags at me – why did this incredibly popular newspaper stop publishing?

A HEROIC DEED

A portion of the back page our artist has devoted to illustrating the rescue of several people from a grave beneath the murky waters of Mobile Bay, by the two newsboys, James MacMahon and John Dumas, who are employed in handling the MASCOT in Mobile. Last Tuesday, several excursionists from Meridan, Miss., got possession of a boat and began sailing on the Bay. Not knowing how to handle the boat, they soon came to grief and were precipitated into the water, and would have been drowned but for the timely arrival of these two heroic youngsters. This gallant conduct deserves recognition at the hands of the people of the Gulf City. Who will start the ball rolling? 

Posted in History, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Book & Food Week One and Two

In the past couple of weeks, I completed four books. To be fair, I had a pretty good start on two of them. Sadly, this will not be a reoccuring experience. I wanted to write about them last week, but with a crazy schedule due to my conference it was near impossible.

Book One: My First Thirty Years by Gertrude Beasley. I first became aware of this book skating around Skate Country during a Big Easy Rollergirl practice with my hand on Vandal O’Riley’s ass (aka Veronica Russell) and then switching to colliding into her with powerful shoulder hits while trying to not tumble over myself. Between grabbing ass and knocking shoulders, we talked. Veronica was an actress from Texas with long red hair, and had a voice that carried over the farthest corner of the skating rink, the gift to not look snobby in clothes that we wore out dancing while she just wore to skate in at 7AM on a Saturday morning, and the ability to speak democratically about firey situations while not offending you as she also inevitbaly insulted you and/or your opinion. She was too just damn funny and sharp to get mad at. And regardless of your stance, one had to almost always (begrudgingly or not) admit that she made sense. Anyway, as Veronica and I squared our shoulders against each other, she told me about an out-of-print book she discovered. It had been published in Paris in 1925 and banned in the United States. It was the memoir of a woman growing up as poor as dirt in Texas. In fact, Larry McMurty wrote that it was the first “genuinely realistic picture of the Southern poor white trash.”

Beasley wrote unapologetically but not without ruminating on her surroundings, her family, and the community around her. Raised in abject poverty with her 12 siblings, a mother she despised yet pitied and a father who was the “meanest man” to ever live – she endured rape at the hands of her older brothers, recpriocal incestuous experimentation with her other brothers near to her age, and an understanding of the dead-end expectations that enclosed her. From an early age, it was established that she, like her worthless family members, would never amount to anything. But Beasley was smart, and proud to the point of critical vanity. She became a schoolteacher who mentally and physically taught with whips and sticks to beat into her students lessons from books and lessons from life. She embraced socialism, traveled, and above all educated herself to an almost dogmatic extreme. Through it all, she tried to hide her past at the same time, and not make peace with it as most memoirs do, but vent her frustration over her family members whom she believed did little or nothing to better their situation.

Veronica had written, acted, directed, and produced a one-woman play based on this obscure book. And years later, I sat in a crowded Bywater theater (can’t remember the exact one) and watched her perform it. Veronica was mesmerizing. Truly. And I felt the same way when I saw her perform it two other times over the next few years. When I discovered that the book was now available on kindle (yes, I am admitting I have a kindle) I immediately downloaded it after Veronica’s last performance. Previously, it was hundreds and hundreds of dollars, if you were even lucky enough to find one in a used bookstore.

I read the book because I was interested in the story after seeing Veronica’s performance so many times, but also because as an artist, it always fascniates me how someone interperts someone else’s work. What did they change, edit, cut? The book was very long and at some points tedioius, and I believed Veronica’s cuts and condensing were wise.

The beginning of the book about her upbringing was brutual, phyiscally and spirtually. But Beasley still handled it not as a victim, but more as an observer who questions not out of self-pity, but out of curiosity the way life tilts its hand. Toward the end of the book, when she was teaching and earning her graduate degree, it took on a more “list tone”: and then this happened, and then this happened, and then this happened. Mainly about how so-and-so pissed her off at school, about the lack of money she made, and details on random men who flirted with her. The description of the flirting men depressed me a bit, because it seemed to be some sort of validation of her decision to be “serious” and eschew men and marriage. It reminded me of when I was in boarding school and we had a social with the Air Force Academy. The boys were nice enough, but no one really interested me. I just danced and laughed and teased them about their short haircuts. This one girl, “Cheryl,” was extremely nice and immensley intelligent but not the least bit at ease around people, particularly boys. I asked her how her night was going and she said, “Great! 5 boys have talked to me!” She was including the ones who asked her where the bathrooms were, or said “excuse me” when they tried to move past her in the crowded lounge area. Cheryl was grasping, but she was trying. At the time, she had neither the social skills nor the conventional looks that made teenage boys look at her as anything more than a roadblock to their destination – be it the bathroom, the punch bowl, or another girl. While Cheryl was merely excited about her inventory of male conversation, Beasley’s list of men who complimented her or “tried to make love to her” made me feel like she was trying to impress me, the reader. Beasley tried too hard. It was the one tedious section of the book. But the beginning of Beasley’s book (roughly the first ¾) was gripping. Although I attached Veronica’s “voice” to it, that voice was well-defined, dauntless, and laden with the confliction that only comes when you are truly honest with yourself. I highly recommend it but…. Unless you have hundreds of dollars and hundreds of hours to hunt for it in used bookstores, you gotta go kindle.

Book Two: Different Seasons by Stephen King. I have never read Stephen King. Never. Never had the urge, but after seeing “The Shawshank Redemption” for the umpteenth time, and vowing to find the short story it was based on and read it, one late night, I actually did. King’s book is actually four novellas and I was thrilled to find another one I wanted to read based on another movie I loved, “The Body,” which became “Stand By Me.” I was also familiar with “Apt Pupil” from seeing it in movie reviews, but have never actually watched it. I read them in order: “Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption,” “Apt Pupil,” “The Body,” and “The Breathing Method.” All solid, but “Apt Pupil” had the most impact on me.

I was vaguely familiar with the movie staring Brad Renfro and Ian McKellen (one of my favorites actors) but knew only the premise. A boy discovers that a man in his neighborhood was a wanted WW2 criminal and blackmails the elderly former Nazi into telling him stories and teaching him his ways while studying his character. What is truly terrifying about this is how masterfully King presents what I believe to be one of humanity’s greatest fears: we never know what goes on in someone’s mind. Sometimes, the ones we love, the ones we trust – unbeknowst to us – are evil. King’s use of a second-person narrative to establish the boy’s inner monologue as well as his parents’ was brilliant. What both were presenting versus what they were REALLY thinking. King didn’t need give an explanation on why the BOY was the way he was, and this lack of explanation did not make the story flawed. Indeed, it was this lack of character clarification that was central to the horror of the story. There is no reason. It just was. It was not bad parenting. It was not drugs. It was not some tramautizing experience. And the inability to justify or rationalize evil is, at the base level, the most paralyzing of any anxiety because it leaves you with a sense that everything you know or feel is worhtless. If instinct and experience are futile, how can you safely navigate your own life surrounded by others? You can’t. And that is terrifying.

The fourth novella. “The Breathing Method,” I found a tad boring. Perhaps the metaphor was lost on me, or perhaps I didn’t care, but “Apt Pupil” was the clear diamond.

Overall, I prefered the Shawshank movie version over the novella (but hey, the movie had Morgan Freeman), the Body was a tie between movie and book, and now I need to watch the movie version of “Apt Pupil” (with a friend because I am a big weenie). And maybe now I will read some more Stephen King.

I also read this on my kindle…

Book Three: New Orleans in the Gilded Age: Politics and Urban Progress 1880-1896 by Joy Jackson. I have written about this book before. And I have read many chapters individually for research but never actually read the whole book. And now I have. And it is good. And it is full of mistakes. And it is but a brief outline. But it’s a great tool to use for further research, and Jackson offers a lot of insight based on her studies. Her theories aren’t portly with pretense (now that sounds pretenious). It’s an important book about New Orleans’ history and I acknowledge that it was the first book of its time to focus on that time period.

Book Four: Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption by Laura Hillenbrand. Louis Zamperini’s story is nothing short of a miracle. A “punk” in training from birth, Zamperini eventually channels his fire from fighting, thievery and pranks to compete in track in the Olympics. He looks to be the first person to conquer the mile in under four minutes when World War II arrives. Zamperini enlists in the air force, is shot down, and surivies at sea in shark-infested waters for 47 days with no rations, only to be captured by the Japanese. And then the real hell begins.

As a POW of the Japanese during the war, the Geneva Convention has absolutely no bearing on his circumstance. Zamperini endures daily torture (mental and physical), starvation, disease, and worse – various humilations. It’s the constant degradation that bears the most difficult with Zamperini and he becomes enemy #1 to a sadistic and violent prison guard nicknamed “The Bird.” All of these complete breakdowns of the body and soul occur with the knowledge that any moment, on the mildest whim, his life could end.  His life not his own, and worse, is run by individuals who view Zamperini and his fellow captors as subhuman. Zamperini witnesses many of his fellow prisioners die from the barbarity that unfortunately appears to be a prerequisite of war. The horrors he endures is unimaginable – like a list written by the devil himself, Zamperini survives one abomination after the next only to have each break or mild reprise quickly soiled by another series of beatings and mental abasement. When he is finally released, Zamperini, like many of his fellow POWs, suffers from extreme PTSD. To cope with the nightmares and flashbacks, Zamperini turns to alochol, and his life, once filled with incaluclable possibility, appears headed for a final tragic chapter as failure after failure occurs. And then he finds Billy Graham and God, in that order, and Zamperini forgives his captors and focuses his life on helping others.

What I took from the book was this: in those kinds of atrocious situations you need at least one or both of these two mental characteristics to survive – the will to live and/or the pride to live. Of course, Zamperini had the will to live, and of course the desire to see his family and friends again was strong, but I believe he was fueled even more by pride. Stripped of all dignity and laden with illness, Zamperini’s self-worth and stubborness were what sustained him. Pride was how, despite the odds being so slim they were almost not even a factor, he continued to exist – they will not break me. They will NOT break me. Over and over again this singular thought went through his mind as he suffered closed fists, rancid food, and even the cruelities of nature. Pride has its power. That gives me comfort. I can not tell you how many times stubborness is the only thing that sustains me. And while it may not be the most enduring character trait – I am still here.

Hillenbrand does an excellent job of not only telling Zamperini’s story but framing it with other characters’ stories. Of course, reading the acknowledgments at the end I could not help but be envious. Hillenbrand conducted over seventy-five interviews with Zamperini, who not only had an excellent memory, but was also a first-class pack rat (left over from his thieving days). One of his scrapbooks from 1917 to 1938 weighed SIXTY-THREE pounds. Oh, what a historian could do with that. A dream! One of the most difficult things about research is deciding what to include and what to exclude, but I would much rather have a bounty of data at my hands to pick and choose from then scrape and dig for mere snippets of information (which is what I am doing now).

At times, the book was difficult to read because of its graphic subject matter, but it was worth it. And it leaves you in awe of Zamperini and the human spirit.

On to food…

Food One: I put tofu in a soy-ginger marinade and grilled it. I thought it was simply okay, but my friend loved it. Not sure I will try it again. Perhaps my tofu grilling technique needs work.

Food Two: I was mainly in Chicago for this week, so it’s kind of a cheat. I will have to go with something I have not made in a long time. Tuna Fish Salad. I made my famous tofu mayonnaise and combined it with tuna (out of all the brands I prefer the generic brand “Best”), hard-boiled and chopped up egg whites, dried onions, and pickles. My tofu “mayo” is enough to last me through about three or four batches of tuna fish salad (which equals about 3 to 4 cans each). It’s an amazing substitute for any recipie that calls for mayo – and is a combination I concoted from about three other recipies. I know, time to get ambitious for next week but damn, a power pack of protein!

 

Posted in Book Reviews, New Orleans, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Spindles

A big box of spindles I bought this weekend at a junk store (in the pouring rain) on St. Claude Avenue that I hope to turn into something wonderful. Stay tuned!

 

Posted in Art, D.I.Y., New Orleans | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mascot Monday 3 of 12: Racism?

At my lecture someone in the audience asked me about racism in the Mascot. I told them that, yes, unfortunately it existed. It’s difficult when there are so many other aspects of the Mascot that I admire. But I also stated that the amount and extremity of racist articles tended to vary according to its editors. Francois Bildstein and P.J. Kelly were the editors at the time this article appeared. Bildstein later went on to be the superintendent of the French Hospital in New Orleans.

Blatant racial discrimination, or something else? Is this Swift-like satire – chiding the “brave” men for taking the law into their own hands against a black man who “dared” to vote? Is their dry mockery too problematic in this day for me to catch? Or are they endorsing the crime?

You decide.

The "Mascot." August 3, 1889

A sensation was caused the other day by the announcement that the dreadful and blood-thirsty regulators of Lafayette, had been captured and were being conveyed to the city under guard of several companies of militia. The time of the arrival of the train was made known, and people of all ages, sex and race flocked to the depot to catch a sight of the patriotic citizens, who viewing for years the prostitution of justice at the hands of the law officers, who had stood idly by and seen crime after crime perpetuated, had determined to punish those who were guilty of violating the law of the land. Our artist has graphically described the way in which these brave, noble, peace-loving men of Lafayette, took the law in their own hands, and dealt out summary justice to a black scoundrel who was so diabolical as to have insulted them by voting and holding political opinions of his own. See how brave they are, and observe the desperate fight they were making against the black scoundrel. Also, mark their marital bearing and manly behavior while in the hands of the militia boys, who, young as they were, considered themselves specially honored in having in custody such distinguished fellow citizens With reference to the regulators it ought to be said that many people who know, say that the whole thing is done for effect by the Governor, who knows full well that none of the men arrested will ever be convicted. 

Posted in History, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment